Home
» Renewables - Science » Does Zero Point Energy Offer a Practical Value?
Does Zero Point Energy Offer a Practical Value?
| September 9, 2011 | Posted by Craig Shields under Renewables - Science |
A reader asks:
Hi, I did a quick search on your website for zero point energy and didn’t find anything. I’ve been hearing some seemingly unrealistic claims. Have you had any exposure to this technology / pseudo-technology?
…. to which I respond:
This is the energy that remains when all other energy is removed from a system. All I know is that two great physicists: Michio Kaku (whom I don’t know personally) and Wally Rippel (whom I do) both say they see no trajectory for the practical use of zero point energy. That’s good enough for me.
Related posts:
Scripps Institution on Global Climate Change
NOW on PBS - Fracking, Natural Gas, and Renewable Energy
Take a COOL Guess – the Fun Quiz on Clean Energy (and Global Warming Remedy). Today’s Topic: The Wor...
[The Vector] Clean Energy Trends 2011 Report
Actually, Kaku is mistaken. While he is right on some things, his time frames are ridiculously too long.
First of all, molecular nanotechnology replicators are being developed quickly and will be available in various forms in the next 10-30 years.
Zero point energy is real, and can be used, and has been used. It is actually the virtual particle unobservable to observable we are after. Read info at http://www.cheniere.org and http://www.zpenergy.com
Negative Resonance Absorption of the Medium, NRAM, technology, allows us to harness zpe power and have things like unlimited running self powering boilers and then you have the John Bedini negative resistance self powering batteries, too.