Energy Subsidies

Frequent commentor Alex C. writes:

We need to get government OUT of control or manipulation over energy. The only role of government is to protect citizens from excessive pollution (excluding the CO2 global warming farce). Let the private sector invest and develop the technologies and let the most ECONOMICAL and CLEAN energy win. A job created by government taking of wealth does NOT create wealth…..it just destroys it.

Alex: I actually agree with most of this. The problem lies in extricating government fully — not just out of the clean energy side, but from the fossil fuel side as well, which, according to reports I find credible, receives 12 times the level of funding that renewables does. And it goes without saying that the nuclear energy industry couldn’t exist for 10 minutes without enormous government subsidies.  The U.S. nuclear industry has received $100 billion in government subsidies over the past half-century, and federal subsidies now worth up to $13 billion a plant. 

As I noted, this list of subsidies for fossil fuels takes many forms, some of them (deliberately?) hidden:

 Construction bonds at low interest rates or tax-free
 Research-and-development programs at low or no cost
 Assuming the legal risks of exploration and development in a company’s stead
 Below-cost loans with lenient repayment conditions
 Income tax breaks, especially featuring obscure provisions in tax laws designed to receive little congressional oversight when they expire
 Sales tax breaks – taxes on petroleum products are lower than average sales tax rates for other goods
 Giving money to international financial institutions (the U.S. has given tens of billions of dollars to the World Bank and U.S. Export-Import Bank to encourage oil production internationally, according to Friends of the Earth)
 The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve
 Construction and protection of the nation’s highway system
 Relaxing the amount of royalties to be paid – apparently, we get about 40% of revenues from oil on public land vs. 60% – 65% in most other countries
 Not forcing the industry to deal with the “externalities” – healthcare costs, long-term environmental damage, etc. — costs that are becoming increasingly clear and subject to quantification

From reading your past comments, I know that you don’t believe that there ARE any externalities about which to be concerned, but I trust you acknowledge the first ten on the list. I hope you’ll tell us what we can do to bring them to an end.

Tagged with: , ,