Sustainability Can Offer Us a Smile

Ventura1I’ve known environmentalist Forbes Black for over a decade, but it was only recently that I noticed his penchant for sarcasm, and damn, he’s good at it.

In response to this piece about L.A.’s transition to sustainability and the comment, “L.A. can become sustainable, but that transition won’t be cheap,” he writes:  Oh! Combating climate change might COST MONEY?! Then BY ALL MEANS we should destroy human civilization instead. It DEFINITELY makes more sense for our government to spend our money on useless weapons systems.

Fabulous stuff.

The truth, of course, is that it is probable that America’s participation in the green economy will create a windfall of additional jobs, along with the accom60440356_451748282054418_6619101325386842112_npanying increase to the tax base.  At least, that is the conclusion drawn by Dr. Robert Pollin, an economist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, who generously spent a couple of hours in two different phone sessions for my second book “Is Renewable Really Doable?”

Of course, what this actually does to the economy isn’t really the issue, just like lowering the abortion rate really isn’t the issue among Christian conservatives who are trying to ban abortions in the U.S. (see piece at right).  What’s happening here is that Big Money is highly resistive to attempts to make wholesale changes in the economy when those changes represent a threat to wealth and power–even when they’re required to maintain the viability of life on Earth.

Tagged with: , , ,
One comment on “Sustainability Can Offer Us a Smile
  1. marcopolo says:

    Craig,

    Nope, I’m afraid I find your fiends observation tedious, trite and unoriginal.

    He’s another “green activist’ with a long list of sneering claims based on nothing more than an ideological wish list.

    like you, it’s my bet he can’t answer any detailed questions about how this “social revolution” will occur, so he’s fairly safe in preaching the virtues of things that will never occur.

    I’ll also bet he’s never done anything practical or useful to help the environment he’s so keen on banging on about.

    When challenged about the practicality of their claims, advocates like yourself and other green ideologues always run and hide behind vague assertions, slogans or belligerent personal abuse.

    “Transitioning to a green economy” and “a windfall of green jobs” along with claiming “increased tax revenues” are all just meaningless gibberish unless you can explain how such an event can be achieved, otherwise it’s just hot air.

    Once again you seem to combine two completely different issues, although in this case the motive is a little more obscure.