Voter Suppression Becomes Law, Though Some Supreme Court Justices Aren’t Having It

From this:

Justice Elena Kagan ripped her conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court on Thursday in a blistering 41-page dissent, accusing them of ignoring the legislative intent of the 1965 Voting Rights Act as well as the high court’s own precedents.

Kagan’s fiery dissenting opinion in a voting rights case, which was joined by the two other liberal members of the court, Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, accused her conservative colleagues of undermining Section 2 of the landmark Voting Rights Act and tragically weakening what she called “a statute that stands as a monument to America’s greatness.”

“Never has a statute done more to advance the nation’s highest ideals. And few laws are more vital in the current moment. Yet in the last decade, this court has treated no statute worse,” she wrote, in what is likely to become a rallying cry for Democratic lawmakers and progressive activists pushing for election reform laws, including the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, in Congress.

All this banter about the 1965 Voting Rights Act is interesting, but I’m having a hard time understanding why these laws in places like Georgia and Arizona aren’t clear violations of the 14th and 15th Amendments, and that six Supreme Court justices somehow disagree. While I get that these people are politically conservative, this case seems so cut and dried. I’m completely lost.