Assessing the Value of Solar Energy
Here’s a really solid article summarizing the thinking we should apply when determining the worth of solar as a replacement for other forms of energy.
There are two main things that are omitted here, and while I have to admit they’re extremely hard (impossible?) to quantify, they’re probably the most important:
• Environmental/Economic Issues that go Beyond Dollars/Ton of CO2. An incremental kilowatt-hour of solar always offsets something. Sometimes (though it’s rare), solar offsets coal, and, in that case, it’s keeping a whole raft of extremely toxic pollutants out of our skies and waterways. Also, how exactly do we put a price on the resultant effects of these pollutants in terms of long-term environmental damage: climate disruption, ocean acidification, loss of biodiversity, etc.?
• The Utility Death Spiral. There is no doubt, now that the cost of solar has fallen so low, that a broad swath of the consumer and business marketplace has an immediate financial interest in putting up solar PV and telling its utility to take a hike, and this applies to people who couldn’t care less about the environmental issues. But the migration to solar has a cascading set of consequences that are extremely difficult to calculate.
I urge readers to check out this terrific article.
we already know about the solar technology and it’s working. This technology had pros and cons also, For the future use it’s good,but use in the chemical industry.