Off-Topic in a Big Way: Changes in the Associated Press Stylebook

When I was told that the writing services I was performing for my client American Diversified Energy needed to conform to their stylebook, I was somewhat shocked.  Who has their own?  ADE is a very professional organization, and they certainly have the right to do whatever they want in this regard, but this isn’t the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, right?  The Associated Press Stylebook is the default for U.S. publications, and it actually never dawned on me that someone would direct me otherwise. 

But, like anything else, the rules that guide the proper use of the English language are constantly changing, generally in the direction of relaxation rather than making us come off as more stilted and pompous.

But here’s a step in the wrong direction, if you ask me: “We are considering changing to use ’s when making a name that ends in S possessive: Mavis Staples’s album, Martha Reeves’s concert.”

Hold on a second here.  The reason we write “Martha Reeves’ concert” is that, at least in part, we’re directing the pronunciation of that phrase.  The possessive form of Martha’s surname needs to be spoken as one syllable, and there is no reason to add ambiguity to that, or make speakers question wonder if they are mispronouncing the name of the event they attended last night.

Thus, we have a rule of grammar that is actually rooted in courtesy.  As etiquette maven Emily Post put it, “Manners are a sensitive awareness of the feelings of others. If you have that awareness, you have good manners, no matter what fork you use.”

Let’s be kind to our readers.

Tagged with:
One comment on “Off-Topic in a Big Way: Changes in the Associated Press Stylebook
  1. marcopolo says:

    Craig,

    Good heavens, you are mass of contradictions!

    On the one hand you are quite adept at taking others to task for minor breaches of grammar (or at least your version of correct grammar) but object when others are equally pedantic.

    You are correct, English is a constantly changing and evolving language, with a wide variety of variations.

    Tong journalists (and many not so young) deliberately incorporate vernacular or slang idiom into print to seem ‘one of the people’ or “easier for the average person to read”.

    This dumbing down in journalism is not new, and certainly has expanded since the role of sub-editors has been downgraded.

    The advent of social media has seen a general deterioration in public behaviour and a loss of respect for formally revered institutions.

    This loss of respect is not always due to the real behaviour of the institutions but because in a desperate effort to stay relevant and in business, all journalism is being reduced to the standard of the old ‘yellow’ or tabloid press.

    An endless stream of sensationalized scandals, wildly exaggerated and published for no other reason than gratuitous, prurient voyeurism, now passes for serious journalism.