Here’s another example of how aggressively meat-eaters deal with vegans. Is this really necessary?
Deer-hunters who eat what they kill and thin a herd that would ultimately starve to death are 100% fine with any sane person, regardless of their dietary habits.
Needless to say, our society is divided on many issues, and a lot of this makes sense. For instance, Trump supporters are not likely to support socialized medicine and free college tuition. I get that.
But now we have meat-eaters who bear a seething hatred of vegans, and nuts like the one whose truck is pictured here. Why does he feel that EVs are “electric shit?”
FWIW, I don’t feel this way at all.
With Trumpism on the rise, we live in a time of great peril, not only for the United States, but for the entire planet. If this goes the wrong way, we have world fascism and a baking planet.
I doubt there were many people who felt this way during World War II, when the future of our whole civilization was at stake. The same is the case here and now.
The answer to the question above really could be yes. World fascism/authoritarianism is a real possibility.
Some might say that if it can happen in the United States, it can happen anywhere.
The caption: The Earth and Moon as seen by the Cassini probe from Saturn’s orbit. All of humanity in one small dot in space.
A reminder of what Carl Sagan said about a photo of Earth from space he called the “pale blue dot,” which begins:
Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there–on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
It continues here.
My thanks to the reader who suggested this to me:
Is it possible that God’s will actually is being done?
That a president tried to overthrow the government is not particularly surprising. Those in power have a natural inclination to remain in power, and this type of activity happens constantly in countries all around the globe.
What’s amazing is that tens of millions of American voters either dispute the clear and compelling evidence that this actually took place, or simply don’t care. Our democracy is teetering on the edge not because a criminal conman happened to come along, but because of a nation jam-packed with hateful idiots.
Good advice to religious leaders: Don’t promote the mutual exclusivity of faith and reason.
Go back to the good old days where religion and science were compatible. Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were collectively known as the “rationalists.” Good times!
Do you really want to say that God sometimes says irrational things? Bad idea!
Here’s where we are, folks.
Almost half our nation eats up Trump’s rhetoric with a spoon.
Earlier today, I had the opportunity to ask some old prep-school chums about something I consider to be absurd: the U.S. Supreme Court’s considering the idea that the president of the United States should enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution.
One such friend, the only conservative in the group, pointed out that presidents have done things in the past, e.g. dropping the first atomic bomb and sending troops into Vietnam, for which he could have been criminally charged. Such immunity would enable the president to do what he thinks is right, and not be worried about going to prison for it.
An interesting response, to be sure, though both of these examples are potential war crimes, which are prosecuted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague. In any case, this seems to be a red herring. What we’re concerned about here is something quite “over the top,” something that would definitely be, and, in all likelihood will be, prosecuted within state and federal jurisdictions.
In particular, there is ample evidence that Donald Trump tried to overthrow the U.S. government, which, if he had been successful, would have made him a king, rather than a public servant. Are we saying that this is a valid direction for our nation to take? Insofar as I don’t recall any mention of the subject in the Constitution, it’s hard to imagine what these SCOTUS people are talking about.
