Revering Our Scientists
What physicist Brian Greene says here is true.
I would be shocked if more than 10% of high school seniors in this country could name a single living scientist.
What physicist Brian Greene says here is true.
I would be shocked if more than 10% of high school seniors in this country could name a single living scientist.
From the Wall Street Journal:
The Biden administration enacted the strictest-ever rules for tailpipe emissions but also handed the auto industry a significant concession by giving them more time to comply, a recognition that the transition to electric cars will take longer than hoped.
This conforms with the sense most of us have about the transition away gas and diesel in favor of electric transportation: it’s informed by a warm (but not red hot) consumer demand, as well as fierce resistance from the fossil fuel industry.
Speaking of demand, I saw a bumper sticker on an older Ford Mustang the other day that read, “This car is a hybrid. It burns gas and rubber.” The rednecks of the world are using this opportunity to ridicule the suffering on the 8 billion citizens of Earth who are experiencing floods, droughts, loss of land mass, etc.
…. seems to have dried up.
Perhaps this is explained by the famous line that actor George C. Scott delivered in his 1970 film portrayal of “Patton”: “American loves a winner, and America will not tolerate a loser. The very thought of losing is hateful to America.”
After all this time, it looks like we’ve arrived at a point where his richest constituents have come to regard Trump as a loser, and by this I do not mean that he’s a lost soul, devoid of integrity and character. That much is certainly true, but these people couldn’t possibly care less about their hero’s ethics and decency. I mean “lower” in the sense of his flagging wealth, and that, in addition, he faces the prospect of losing his freedom as well.
It appears that big money has no further appetite for investment in a man who simply appears to be falling off a cliff.
Most American women who live within, say, 25 miles of downtown anywhere are educated and career-oriented. They deeply resent the Republicans’ far-right position on abortion, and oppose most of the other principles of Trumpism, e.g., white nationalism, the rejection of science, and the Big Lie.
This is why they helped Biden win by 7 million votes in 2020, a margin that can only be expected to widen in 2024.
As astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson puts it, photos like the one here are evidence that we live in a country with a) free speech and b) failed education.
Here, you’re free to believe in things like the flat Earth, chemtrails, the Big Lie, climate change as a hoax, Dr. Fauci working to destroy the U.S. economy, and Bill Gates enslaving the world’s people.
Fortunately, the rest of us are free to regard you as the nut-jobs you are, and to minimize your effect on organized society.
There has been much discussion concerning the relationship between educational levels and political leanings. There is no doubt, for instance, that one is more likely to encounter a Trump supporter running a hardware store in rural Mississippi than teaching cardiology in a university hospital in Massachusetts.
Let’s grant that there is a strong correlation here; after all, Trump says that he “loves the uneducated.” But is there causation? Does education actively reduce the tendency to adopt Trumpist principles?
I’ll end this here and hope for a few comments that attempt to answer the matter.
The numbers at left re-enforce my belief that Lincoln should have accepted the secession of the Confederacy in 1861, telling them:
So long. Sorry your slaves will have to suffer, but it won’t be long until you, a pariah nation, simply implodes from things like lack of innovation and trading partners. By 1870, a few small gangs of Mexican banditos will come across the border and blow you fools to bits.
I had to laugh when I saw this, and how illustrative it is of the conditions of abject stupidity in which this country lives right now.
Sure, all presidential campaigns seek to make the differences between a candidate and his opponent as clear as possible, even if that means exaggeration.
But seriously? He won’t be a dictator?
Is someone suggesting that there should be some factual accuracy in what Trump says?
If he’s proven anything since his arrival on the U.S. political scene, it’s that lies are just as good as the truth in the minds of his supporters.
It sure will be good to get through this ghastly period in our nation’s history.