My trip back East for the week of February 13 has really taken shape; it’s packed with business meetings, book interviews, and dinners with college buddies and family, starting in Washington DC, and heading north: Baltimore, Philadelphia, northern New Jersey, New York City, Rhinebeck (gorgeous little town 90 miles north of Manhattan), Amherst, and Boston.

I make a concerted effort to “travel green.” Like most of us, I fly less, and conduct more business electronically. But I also try to replace automobiles with trains.  The Amtrak people will be happy to know that I think of their service as my rolling office. And a bonus awaits at both ends: Did you even notice how much more appealing train stations are than airports?

All aboard!

Tagged with:

It’s certain that 6600-pound Hummers will not occupy an important position in the way we transport our bodies and our “stuff” in the coming years.  But where exactly are we going?  And who’s going to make a buck in the process?

I hope you’ll be able to join us for our next webinar, 10 AM PST on Friday, Feb. 10th: “The Future of Transportation,” in which I’ll be interviewing Dan Sturges.  Dan’s life is dedicated to developing and promoting a complex and dynamic set of solutions built around overhauling the way we move ourselves and our cargo around the surface of the planet.  He shares my belief that our current conception of transportation — redundant, heavy, bulky, and fossil-fuel-reliant – is simply unaffordable in every sense of the word. It’s not economically sound to the individual consumer, and it’s exorbitantly expensive to society as a whole, both financially and ecologically.

In this lively discussion, Dan will explain how mass transit, car-sharing, ride-sharing, and micro-rentals can begin to reduce car ownership.  He’ll talk about introducing small, light, and inexpensive urban transportation, while encouraging walking and bicycling, and the use of information and communication technology to make these blended solutions convenient and appealing, thus ensuring the consumer-citizen adopts these concepts enthusiastically.

I certainly hope you can make it.  Here’s the sign-up form:  http://2greenenergy.com/free-webinar/

 

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

To simplify where we are as a civilization and where we’re going with respect to energy consumption, economics, and environmentalism, it’s useful to postulate three broad “plans”:

Plan A:  We continue on our current course. We ignore the fact that our population will soon be growing from 7 billion to 10 billion, and that an ever-growing percentage of that population is joining the ranks of consumers. Our leaders know that we’re in the process of driving off a cliff; they may lack basic decency, but they’re long on intelligence, and they exploit voter ignorance of this core  truth as long as they possibly can.  During this time, they and the extraordinarily powerful forces that elected them desperately look for new ways of extracting fossil fuels, while obfuscating the effects on global climate, ocean acidification, social chaos, war, respiratory disease, etc.  The elite remain in power until the planet is in ruins.  

Plan B: We aggressively adopt what Jeremy Rifkin and others refer to as “The Third Industrial Revolution,” which contemplates continued economic growth by focusing on renewable energy and the many other components of sustainability.  (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A friend who favors right-wing ideologies sent me a video in which the Cato Institute ripped up Obama’s State of the Union Address, pointing out certain claims as lies – even challenging the legality of some of the actions he’s taken as president. While I’m not a huge fan of the Cato Institute, they’re no fools, and they certainly make some good points here. Let’s also admit that Obama has been a bitter disappointment, as millions of us realized that he’s just another politician, put in place with huge money (in this case, Big Pharma and Wall Street) to protect and expand these interests. (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What happens when a talented filmmaker sets out to interview top scientists and philosophers, and attempts to answer some very tough questions? What if those questions include subjects as broad as “What’s going wrong with our present day civilization?” and “What can we do to fix it?”

Check out “I AM.” My wife and I were in tears of utter joy, swept away by the brilliance and beauty.

Tagged with:

Question: At what rate are we losing the world’s rainforests?

Answer: Can be found at http://2greenenergy.com/cool-guess-answers/8732.

Relevance: According to rain-tree.com:

If nothing is done to curb this trend, the entire Amazon could well be gone within fifty years.  Massive deforestation brings with it many ugly consequences-air and water pollution, soil erosion, malaria epidemics, the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the eviction and decimation of indigenous Indian tribes, and the loss of biodiversity through extinction of plants and animals. Fewer rainforests mean less rain, less oxygen for us to breathe, and an increased threat from global warming.

 

 

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

We don’t talk too much about eco-tourism here, which is a shame, as it’s an extremely important trend in the travel industry. I just got off the phone with Chuck Miller, who, among other things, runs Tunungua Eco-Resort with some partners.

Check this place out! Located in the lush Boyaca valley of Colombia, a three-hour drive from Bogata, Columbia, the whole place was built in the most environmentally-responsible manner possible, and offers a huge range of activities that reconnect its lucky guests with the incredible natural beauty that surrounds it.

Tagged with: , ,

Readers may be interested in the conversation Glenn Doty and I are having on electric vehicles, as comments to my piece: Lateral Power, Distributed Generation, and the Third Industrial Revolution. Here’s another question for Glenn (and anyone else who would like to join in) on the subject.

Glenn: You make some terrific points here, and you have my promise that I’ll try to continue to merit your respect.

Going back to this deal about gasoline, aren’t you at all concerned about the fact that we’re apparently running out of it? Everyone I can find (except the spokespeople for the American Petroleum Institute) seem to concur.  As Matt Simmons told me shortly before he passed away, “National security, environmental damage, and lung disease are all reasons that we SHOULD do something about our oil addiction. Peak oil,  on the other hand, is the reason that we MUST.” 

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,

A reader notes:

I did not see a comparison to natural gas powered vehicles. It’s the most abundant fuel we have in the US, and it’s dirt-cheap.

True. Personally, I favor electric transportation because of the potential for clean transportation if they are powered with clean, renewable sources, and because of the ubiquity of the electrical grid. One can unplug one’s toaster and plug in one’s car. It is for this reason that I do not favor hydrogen; we have a landmass of 3.5 million square miles in the continental U.S. alone that would be fabulously expensive to retrofit for another fuel. Natural gas has, to a great degree, the same issue.

Other points to consider: natural gas is a fossil fuel (bad), but it’s an energy source, versus a carrier like hydrogen (good).

Finally, the reason that natural gas is abundant and thus “dirt-cheap” (as you say) is because of fracking, a practice that has considerable environmental costs that we’re just beginning to understand. 

 

 

Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Frequent commenter Glenn Doty points out that statistically, violence reduces oil production, and believes that the reason behind the invasion of Iraq was not about the access to oil per se, but for CONTROL of PROFIT from the oil. He writes:

That distinction is important, because if you shift the primary fuel dependence to require access to lithium, the motivation to control the profit from lithium will become just as strong as the current motivation to control the profit from oil… That means if we elect another warmonger, we might just find a reason to invade Chile for control of their salt flats… or something similar.

I agree that centralized control of a single commodity (say, oil) breeds autocracy and oppression. This, of course, is Thomas L. Friedman’s concept: “Fill ‘er up with dictators.” It’s also what James Woolsey (four presidential appointments, including director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency) told me when I spoke with him in preparation for my first book. (more…)

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,