The comment at left is from former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich, and it’s hard to dispute.
Allowing Trump to use some technicality to avoid prosecution for the 91 felonies of which he’s accused says one thing: all American citizens are held accountable for their actions–except the president, the one with the most power in all the country.
Sadly, very few young people can name (let alone look up to) a single living scientist.
Ultimately, this is due to our society’s fixation on money. Rock stars and football quarterbacks enjoy vast media exposure and draw the attention of hundreds of millions of adoring fans.
Our scientists may be developing the next pandemic vaccine or technology that will mitigate the climate change that threatens to bake our planet, but they do so in near total obscurity. Their work may save millions of lives and change the world for the better over a long period of time, but there is nothing sexy about it whatsoever.
Re: Trump’s post at left, economic analyst Robert Rapier writes:
He already predicted in 2020: “If Biden is elected, the stock market will crash and your 401k will be zero.”
Now that the stock market is at a record high, he says it’s because people expect him to win. That’s not how the stock market works. It’s at a record high because economic indicators are strongly improving. He either doesn’t understand how the market works, or he does and doesn’t think you will know he’s lying.
What we’ve learned about Trump throughout his tenure in politics and the 30K+ lies he told in office is that he has no shame. He’s willing to swear to something that an 8-year-old kid would reject as BS.
That said, he’s at the end of his rope; the evidence of his guilt in the 91 felony counts he faces, especially the testimony of dozens, maybe hundreds of eyewitnesses, is about to crush his political viability like a grape.
This from French Enlightenment writer, historian, and philosopher François-Marie Arouet, known to us as Voltaire. If you’ve never read Candide, I hope you’ll treat yourself.
The reason he’s correct here is the truth of what Plato said 2000 years prior, which I paraphrase: Only people who do not desire power are qualified to have it.
The United States has had its issues with a few presidents, e.g., Jackson, Harding, and Nixon, though, until Trump, we never had a leader whose interests were based only on his own enrichment and aggrandizement.
Without doubt, there are many vectors in American civilization that have all come together to create what we call “Trumpism” or the MAGA movement.
One, of course, is the presence of Trump himself. Until 2015, when he came on the political scene, no one had dared to run for U.S. president on a platform of hate and lies, e.g., immigrants are taking your jobs, the Democrats are coming for your guns, LGTBQs are grooming your children while schools are teaching them to hate America, climate scientists and epidemiologists are corrupt, etc.
Another factor here is the decline in our educational system and the accompanying loss of young people’s capacity for critical thinking.
Yet, to be fair, a great deal of the glue that holds Trump supporters together is the resentment with which they regard our socio-economic landscape, i.e., that their wages have stagnated over the 40+ years, at the exact point in time at which the top 1% have become rich beyond measure. If you were watching the world pass you by in terms of real income and net worth, you may be easy pickin’s for the MAGA rhetoric yourself.
My conservative mother points out that, whenever Trump is attacked, his popularity rises.
There does seem to be some truth here, though perhaps the causal element here is simply that his name stays in the news. For example, the media loves Trump’s Christmas post here, in which he expresses his hope that all progressives ROT IN HELL (emphasis his).
Of course, that’s not a very Christian thing to wish, but isn’t that the point? It needs to be sufficiently controversial so as to essentially force the press to run with it.
Back to the post and its effect on Trump’s approval rating. There must be a point at which insane rants like these are more sneered at and rejected by American voters than they are appreciated. We’re angry, and we’re clearly not too bright, but again, there must be a point which these tactics fail to achieve its objectives.
Until his retirement, Rick Sikes managed the fleet of cars and trucks operating in the city of Santa Monica, CA, a municipality generally known for its progressive stance with respect to environmental stewardship. He worked hard to integrate alternative-fueled vehicles of all types: electric, yes, but also an interesting array of hydrogen, natural gas, even propane.
I interviewed Rick as the basis for a chapter of my first book, “Renewable Energy–Facts and Fantasies,” as an example of what forward-thinking cities are capable of when it comes to phasing out petroleum. I conducted the talk on a walking tour of his facility, which features huge tanks of different types of fuel, during which I asked, jokingly, “Am I in any personal danger here this afternoon?”
Taking me seriously, Rick replied that gas-powered vehicles are far more likely to catch fire than EVs and the rest. In fact, there are so many explosions of traditional cars each day that most of them don’t even make the local news.