We commonly run across memes like the one here, whose point is that government and other people owe us nothing.
I know there are people who believe that, but I don’t think they’re very smart.
When human beings formed organized societies about 10,000 years ago, they wisely decided to make and enforce rules that restricted behavior. That’s because it was obvious that, left unchecked, people would enslave, torture, murder, steal from one another, etc. (more…)
That last paragraph might be a tad aggressive in a conversation with what you now know to be an omnipotent being.
I agree with its content, but I would have kept those thoughts to myself.
What Aristotle said here is vitally important to a successful life.
There is a problem, however, in that some things are objectively true and others objectively false. If you try to “be critical and evaluate what you believe in,” and not understand that you might be sitting on a ton of cognitive biases, you may wind up accepting the Big Lie or wanting to prosecute Anthony Fauci.
From the late 19th Century until Einstein published his work on special relativity in 1905, a great number of scientists believed that physics had gotten to the point of a near complete understanding of the universe.
This was probably due to a form of conceit, i.e., that all forces, particles, fields, etc., conform to human intuition. What we’ve learned since, of course, is that phenomena that are either very small or very large contain huge paradoxes.
I took one semester of quantum mechanics. I got a C+, for which I was grateful. It never entered my mind to take a second semester.
What Bertolt Brecht said here is interesting, but it’s untrue, at least in the United States under most circumstances.
The First Amendment does not protect certain types of speech, but generally, deliberate lying is fine, as long as it’s not an overtly criminal act, e.g., perjury, inciting to violence, or defamation.
This is an important distinction in today’s America because we have an entire political party, a former president and 2024 candidate, and several “news” organizations whose only characteristic making them viable is nonstop lying.
Wow, that’s one powerful photograph.
It makes one think: 100 years from now, who will have had the better life?
Presuming they’re Americans, the old lady lived through the Great Depression and numerous wars, and doubtlessly had to deal with many personal hardships and losses.
The baby will benefit from all manner of technology: IT, communications, and especially healthcare; he’ll likely live a longer and healthier life.
Exactly what he’s going to have to deal with in terms of everything else, however, is anyone’s guess. Nuclear war? World fascism? The demise of U.S. democracy? Environmental devastation?
On a less dramatic basis, what about a loss of job opportunities as automation and AI replace human labor?
We can only wish him luck.
My father left college temporarily to drop bombs on the fascists’ oil refineries, completing 29 successful missions before being shot down, and, with his men, spending the last six months of the war in a POW camp.
My role as an anti-fascist is far less exciting, though, with joining protest marches and my daily writing, I’d like to think I’ve made a difference.
Miss you, Dad.
Trump tried to overthrow the U.S. government, and some bozo wants to charge him with parking in a handicapped space?
In most of Europe, highways, like the one shown here, are constructed such that populations of wild animals are not cut off from one another.
This eco-friendly civil engineering practice is virtually nonexistent in the United States.
A reader notes: I’m certain their defense will be, “What, it’s a form of recycling…!”
Yes, they lied, but ironically, in this case, the world’s a (slightly) better place as a result. Reusing is almost always better than recycling.
