The Bifurcation of Philosophy and Science
At left is a good example of what I mean when I say, “It hasn’t been a good couple of hundred years for philosophers.”
In Locke’s day, the 18th Century, it was the province of philosophy to make statements that today are made by neuroscientists and epigeneticists. Moreover, we now know that what Locke said here is incorrect.
Similarly, until recently the subject of the cosmos and the building blocks of the universe was the purview of philosophers, metaphysicians in particular. Now, we turn to particle physicists for direction here.
I’ve been a fan of Sartre since my teen years. Maybe that, at last in part, explains why girls weren’t particularly attracted to me.
No one with any moral sensibilities is thrilled with the prospect of another Trump administration, but let’s recognize that this could be the chance for redemption that the United States desperately needs.
From 
It’s fashionable nowadays to suggest that our schools add stuff to their curricula. Normally, these items are intended to make our young people more independent of a system that is rapidly deteriorating, and include things like growing one’s own food.
The United States has no official language, and its citizenship test may be taken in any of dozens of languages.
Though Trump seems to have control of the Republican party, and thus the U.S. government, there are members of the GOP, e.g., Liz Cheney, who aren’t willing to concede on matters of truth and rule of law.
Pastor Brandon’s argument is one we’ve seen before. Maybe liberalism is simply a collection of better ideas than conservatism, and that’s the reason we find them in places of higher education.
Here’s a short 
Apparently, there are people who don’t understand that the United States produces more crude oil than any country on Earth, at any time in world history.
