Home › Blog › Page 83

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Renewables - Politics

Here’s an article from Fox News: Stephen A. Smith reacts to Trump’s guilty verdict, says it ‘all points to civil war.’

Well, here are a few legitimate questions, I believe:

When will it begin?  There were more people milling around our local hardware store yesterday than there were Trumpers supporting their leader in front of the courthouse in New York where the jury was deliberating, ultimately to convict the former president of all the 34 felony charges against him.

What form will it take?  Whom will his base of heavily armed morons attack?  All 40 million of us woke Californians?

When and how will it end?  How does one think that whatever tiny percentage of the Trump base that doesn’t mind spending years or decades in prison will fare against 1.3 million law enforcement personnel as assisted by the U.S. military with its $800 billion annual budget? We’re #1 in spending on military personnel and weapons, more than the next 14 countries combined. These soldiers have pledged their honor to the U.S. Constitution, not to a single deranged criminal.  I give it a few days, max.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Electric Vehicles

Here’s conclusion from a recent report from my colleague Renaldo Brutoco on battery EVs (BEVs) and hydrogen fuel-cell EVs (FCEVs):

As we continue to advance towards a low-carbon future, both BEVs and FCEVs will play pivotal roles. By embracing both technologies, we can ensure a smoother transition to sustainable mobility, effectively mitigating the environmental impact of our transportation needs while satisfying the diverse requirements of consumers and industry. This dual approach not only maximizes the benefits of each technology but also exemplifies the innovative strategies needed to overcome modern energy challenges.  

I respectfully disagree.  Eventually, the winner will win and loser will lose.  And, in particular, hydrogen will lose out, even though BEVs, as Renaldo correctly indicated in his piece, have challenges.

We’ve been talking with great enthusiasm about hydrogen since I was a teenager in the early 1970s, but with virtually no progress over the intervening period.  At stake is the cost of producing H2 from the electrolysis of water or the reformation of methane, the cost and fragility of fuel cells, and, most importantly, the absence of a fuel delivery infrastructure and the enormous economic and logistical challenges associated with overcoming that issue.

What will eventually happen with hydrogen in transportation is exactly what happened to wave energy, ocean current energy, run of river hydrokinetics, biomass, and geothermal in renewable energy.  Outside of niche applications, they all lost as the technology of solar and wind matured and the costs fell precipitously.

I know Renaldo is a huge fan of hydrogen, but it’s time to say goodbye.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Climate Change

This from Norm Ornstein, emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a Washington, D.C., conservative think tank.

Good for a conservative to put science in front of politics and religion.

Also, good for a conservative to give a damn about the losses that the common American faces from storm floods, wildfires, etc.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Climate Change

Will the oil companies attack the living hell out of Vermont’s new law?  Of course.  Will the legislation survive the onslaught of law suits that Big Oil brings against it?  Probably not.

But the point is that it’s the first attempt in the United States to internalize the externalities of burning hydrocarbons, i.e., prohibiting the fossil fuel boys from using the Earth’s atmosphere as their own private sewer.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Renewables - Politics

In our media, the decision re: what to cover is just as important as how to cover it.

Of course, sometimes a subject simply cannot be ignored, like Trump’s conviction on all 34 felony counts concerning election interference / business fraud.  Then, if you’re Fox News, you need to spin this as an unfair attack from a political opponent.

Their viewers could question what influence Joe Biden has on the New York State justice system, but that’s extremely unlikely to happen.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Renewables - Politics

A reader notes: I’ll be honest. I feel like I overestimated her.

Isn’t that the God’s-honest truth?

It’s hard to think of anyone less impressive than a progressive who turns into a Trump supporter, especially when it’s purely for political gain.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Sustainability

I listened to a Ted Talk the other day that was given by a linguist and university professor of English, whose point was that the language is always changing, and that we shouldn’t be so rigid in our interpretation of others’ speech and writing.  As an example, she said that a few hundred years ago, the word “lollygag” meant to make out / kiss.

The problem I have with this is that window stickers like the one shown here is that they simply make you look like an idiot. This isn’t the morphing of language; it’s ignorance, and there’s plenty of that to go around, especially when it comes to political issues like this one.

I heard a television commentator covering a golf tournament describe an errant shot like this: “That ball could have went anywhere.” I’m hoping he got reassigned, perhaps to cage fighting.

While it’s true that the language is always in flux, poor grammar makes it hard for educated people to accept you as one of their own. When I tutor kids in English, I take my responsibilities in this regard quite seriously.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Renewables - Politics

As an advocate of free speech, I have no problem with this display outside the courtroom during the jury’s deliberation on the 34 felony counts of election interference, better known, albeit erroneously, as the “hush-money” case.

And here’s my reaction, also protected under the First Amendment: These people are despicable.  

I do note, however, that they were relatively few in number.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Renewables - Politics

Todd:  If it makes you feel any better, you’re far from the first, and you won’t be the last.

Trump destroys others’ lives in order to enhance his own.  It’s his core strength; it’s what he’s been doing since his childhood. You were just another victim in a very long line.

Tagged with:

by craigshieldsPosted on Posted in Climate Change
A reader offers this:
Why are visionaries like  Tony Robbins investing in space tourism?
Simple: the space tourism industry is projected to capture a significant share of the $2.25 trillion luxury travel market.
With unprecedented growth and major players like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic leading the way…
If you’re not invested in these companies, you’re missing out. But how do you ensure you’re invested in the *right* ventures at the *right* stage?
That’s where InterFlight Global comes in.  We give accredited investors access to exclusive, off-market opportunities in aerospace and space tourism, poised for explosive growth. 
Two Comments:
1) My answer to the opening question: Why are visionaries like  Tony Robbins investing in space tourism? What they’re interested in is your money. I very much doubt that investors will ever see a dime in return.
2) The idea of space tourism, further contributing to the demise of our home planet, is obscene.
Tagged with: