Environmental Law Institute Reports on Subsidies for Energy Companies

Environmental Law Institute Reports on Subsidies for Energy Companies

During a slow period at the Electric Drive Transportation Association conference this afternoon, I walked a couple of miles across town to interview spokespeople for the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) – Senior Attorneys Jay Pendergrass and Lisa Goldman.  We talked largely about the subsidies that our US federal government provides to energy companies, insofar as ELI recently completed a comprehensive, independent study on the subject.  “This is by far the most widely distributed report we’ve ever created,” Jay told me.  “It’s been downloaded over 18,000 times.”

ELI painstakingly pulled together information on every form of expenditures or forbearance (e.g., a tax break) that is given to fossil fuels, carbon capture and sequestration, corn ethanol, and what it calls “traditional renewables” like solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal.

The results are in the report linked above: fossil fuels get about $5.50 for every $1 going to renewables.

My main question, of course, is why our government is doing this.  The role of subsidies is to promote things that are in the public interest.  All the $70.2 billion that is going to traditional fossil fuels is accomplishing is creating “a transfer of wealth from the public to the shareholders of oil, coal, and gas companies,” as Jay explained.  Here’s $70 billion that could (should??) be going to promote things that actually are in the public interest: an end to our addiction to oil, to our empowering our enemies, to our poisoning our planet and everything living on it.

Interesting discussion, to be sure.

Now I’m off to the welcome party.  I’ll try to turn down my cynicism and enjoy myself.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
One comment on “Environmental Law Institute Reports on Subsidies for Energy Companies
  1. buy silver says:

    While its understood that a definitive move away from petroleum-based fuel is an absolute necessity for the sake of the planets health there is as yet no one ideal solution for going forward. Fortunately the continued discussion and research mean that we will see some real progress on this problem perhaps even sooner than seems possible..