When I have a few extra minutes, I blog on a range of other energy-related sites.  A reader of one of these, EnergyCollective.com, writes:

Great article (meaning this one).

It’s unfortunate that this piece couldn’t have been written ten years ago. I am one of those people that does not understand why the EV community has not been talking about why we have not been driving more affordable, longer range EVs for the last ten years and why we had to wait for Li-ion technology when there was proven, less expensive, longer-lasting and recycleable NiMH (nickel metal hydride). Every time I see my friend’s 10 year old Toyota RAV4-EV go 100 miles on its original batteries (PEVE 95), I think it’a a crime against humanity; everyone could have been driving an even better NiMH powered car.

For some time now, I have listened to Chevron’s excuses about how they sold Cobasys and how it’s not their hot potato anymore without admitting that they or GM still controls the rights to NiMH for EVs. Their smokescreen is aided and abetted by the press which chooses to play dumb or is afraid to address the issue. The fact is that Chevron and GM still control NiMH use and are responsible for at least ten years of increased consumer transportation costs and more pollution than 10 Gulf Disasters.

Craig, am I preaching to the choir?

Perhaps, but I appreciate what you’ve said there, and you’re 100% on target. I never thought of it as a “crime against humanity,” as you put it, yet it’s  actually quite apt.  Thanks for writing.

Tagged with: , , , , ,

I know not everyone studies the well-to-wheels comparisons of fuel sources for transportation, and that there are people who harbor grave misunderstanding in the area.  Here, frequent commenter Glenn Doty writes:

With our current grid, nearly 100% of the energy used to power EV’s will be coal. That means that a Nissan Leaf will cause more than twice the emissions/mile as a Toyota Prius, and that’s only the marginal emissions. Once the initial capital emissions are considered, it will be significantly worse still.

In no way would EV’s be better for the environment than HEV’s – which are far less expensive.

EV’s will universally do far greater harm than ICEV’s if you compare similar size vehicles. So why are they being pushed as “green”?

All I can say in response is to request that he – and others who have similar beliefs – read one of the numerous studies on auto emissions that has been done recently on the subject, like this one by Sherry Boschert showing just the opposite.

Tagged with: , , , ,

If you haven’t attended one of the Techbrew MegaMixers, I’m afraid words may fail to communicate what they’re like. Let’s just say “cleantech entrepreneurs and investors meet the absolute core of the meaning of the phrase ‘New Age.’”  Musical performace by B4Neptune.  Trippy, but without a doubt, a very worthwhile experience.  At the least, the folks I met at the 2011 incarnation last night made it more than worth the drive.

Tagged with: , , ,

Tom Blakeslee is a 2GreenEnergy friend, a widely-published author, a philanthropist, and a really smart guy.  He also plays a mean game of paddle tennis, as I learned first-hand, when I met him at his home in Southern California.  

Tom just published this article on futuristic clean energy technologies that I hope readers will find interesting.

Tagged with: ,

Here’s another in a series of free reports, based on the results of a recent 2GreenEnergy survey of industry businesspeople. Linked here, “How US Companies Can Build Relationships with China” is now available for free download.

The sheer volume of questions I receive on China every week is ridiculous – and it seems to be growing even larger. People in cleantech view China the way the famous robber viewed banks: it’s where the money is. And, as the US continues to sit on its hands and let the rest of the world lead the way to clean energy, folks are looking to China as the real source of vision and power in this space. As an American, I’m not happy about it, but it’s true.

As you’ll notice, the report presents the level of interest that American entrepreneurs have in various activities  vis-à-vis China. It’s broken down along numerous different “sub-interests: selling products and services, raising capital from Chinese public sector agencies and private investors, developing relationships with manufacturers, establishing sales channels, and protecting IP from expropriation by Chinese or other foreign companies. We also asked people about their interests in certain general areas of technology: LED lighting, water purification, renewable energy, energy efficiency, electric transportation, and sustainable architecture.

The survey also explores a number of higher level issues:

  • The most exciting aspects – as well as the drawbacks — of the rapidly expanding size of the Chinese economy in renewable energy, electric transportation, and cleantech more generally
  • Fears associated with dealing with the Chinese, and the changes respondents would like to see regarding the way the Chinese operate with respect to the rest of the world

If you download the report, you’ll learn:

  • The level of awareness and excitement concerning business potential that China represents generally
  • What exactly is fueling this enthusiasm
  • Where respondents see the greatest areas of concern and fear
  • How respondents perceive the challenges associated with poor product quality; issues with communication and cross-cultural understanding, and customs that make conflict resolution quite difficult and intellectual property hard to protect
  • Response to moral issues: sustainability and human rights

These are all monstrously tough issues. I’m reminded of the cartoon in which a scientist is presenting two equations, between which he’s written: “Miracle occurs here.” Apparently, that’s what we need.

Again, here’s the report: “How US Companies Can Build Relationships with China”

Tagged with: , ,

Wally Rippel, whom I interviewed for both my last book and current effort, led a team of college kids at Cal Tech in an electric vehicle race against MIT – in the 1960s! That’s not just yesterday, is it?

Fortunately for the world, over the last half century there have been many thousands of good-natured competitions in cleantech through the years, where teams of (mostly young) people vie to develop the best, fastest, lightest, and most efficient gizmos possible – many of which have made meaningful progress in the world’s quest for sustainability.

Readers may want to follow this year’s Solar Decathlon, sponsored by the US Department of Energy.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

As we all well know, China is front and center on the world stage when it comes to energy. The “awakening giant” is simultaneously the world’s biggest polluter and most aggressive clean energy investor, with bold, fully committed plans to deploy massive amounts of solar, wind, and other technologies over the coming decade. Indeed, it’s hard to open an article on the subject of renewables and not find some mention of the pace at which China is investing in clean energy.

But let’s explore this further, and look behind some of the headlines. Why exactly is this happening? In this month’s 2GreenEnergy survey, we ask you to rate your level of agreement with a half-dozen or so different propositions on the subject. Please click here to participate. Thanks very much!

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

Representatives from thirteen African nations joined together between June 30th and July 1st at a conference called “Power Kick for Africa”. 

Held in Nigeria, the two key themes of the conference were: 
1) How to gain access to cleaner, more affordable energy for African nations, and
2) that women should be strong participants to help quality of life and acceptance in the family and community. 

(more…)

Tagged with:

Here’s a piece I just wrote for a client: “EV Profiler.”  Hope you enjoy. If you’re interested, please let me know.

It would certainly be foolish to underestimate the challenge the world faces in migrating to electric transportation. Just like any paradigm shift, pulling people away from their gasoline and diesel-fuelled vehicles requires that we dislodge habits that have become part of the fabric of the way our modern civilization lives.

Of course, the died-in-the-wool environmentalists (“tree-huggers,” as it were) will buy electric vehicles, regardless of the fact that they cost a bit more, and limit the driver’s freedom. Now, we know that certain people will make sacrifices for the common good, and some actually pride themselves on this point. Rightly, they see that weaning our nation off oil is indeed a common good – for a great number of different reasons. But what percentage of the population does this represent? No one knows; let’s be generous and say it’s 10%.

Conversely, there is another sector of the population that wouldn’t take an EV if it were given to them. I’m not sure I understand the mentality of these people quite as well, but rest assured, they’re out there. Let’s say that is another 10%.

But what about everybody else? After all, that’s a whopping 80% — an enormous number of pragmatists, with real-world concerns about things like fuel savings, total cost of ownership, and range anxiety. A huge segment of Americans will find themselves sitting on the fence. Isn’t there something that can be done to assuage their concerns?

I’m not sure how I would have answered that question last week, but this is now. I just ran across a device called the EV Profiler, a tool that addresses a core question that most consumers have about the emerging electric vehicle market: “Will it work for me?”

Imagine a conversation at the Nissan LEAF dealership that goes something like this:

Customer: You say I’ll get 100 miles in range. But I drive in hilly terrain, and I’m not exactly a little old lady behind the wheel. I do 75 miles per hour on the freeways – and more when I think I can get away with it. Somebody told me that, mile per mile, I’ll use twice as much charge at 75 as I would at 40. This sounds like a non-starter to me.

Salesman: I hear ya – and there’s an easy way to find out. Put this in your car for a week, and drive normally. It transmits your exact real-time energy use to a computer; tracks your speed, acceleration, climbing and descending hills, and so forth – all with amazing accuracy. At the end of the week, we’ll look at the report, and see exactly how far you could have gone in the LEAF.

Kind of takes the guesswork out of the equation, doesn’t it?

So what is the EV Profiler? Here’s a device that evaluates your driving conditions and style as they currently exist in the driver’s gasoline-powered car, and shows the battery requirements for the same travel in different models of electric vehicles: the Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, Ford Focus and Transit Connect van and the Tesla Model S.

In summary, the EV Profiler:

  • Turns a person’s existing vehicle into a virtual EV
  • Records and analyzes customers’ real world driving conditions, and simulates those same conditions in different EVs
  • Is quick and easy to use: mount it onto the windshield, plug it into the cigarette lighter, and drive as usual
  • Records your vehicle’s exact motion, speed, acceleration, and altitude — every second
  • Sends your vehicle’s motion data via cellular to EV Profiler’s computers which emails a daily report simulating different EVs
  • Responsibly and accurately alleviates range anxiety for thousands of fleet managers and potential EV consumers
  • Works totally automatically in any existing vehicle
  • Is rented for a week or two for a few dollars a day
  • Allows consumers to test drive an EV without ever being in one

If you’re interested in an EV and you’d like to know: “Will it work for me?” here’s a way to answer the question without any doubt.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

I’m happy to report that Orion Walker, a professor at Mendocino College in Northern California, has decided to include “Renewable Energy — Facts and Fantasies” as part of the required reading for his course “Introduction to Cleantech” this fall.  I spoke with him on the phone just now, and volunteered to come up and speak to the class; we’ll try to make that happen.

Tagged with: , ,